netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6.

To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tcp port selection for IPV6.
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:53:18 -0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=XjT0/E5ZE4fscvxIlixoTb5iHNbEPdnfIgPLzhGtPiAKyj9UORu5zxT+oezdpPgePaoG6/mrgmB1lgRGSeczaGwA+Nvco4GqlRAa/xRnsZ2zzkyN0IiaAl0Ygcac8O6nlpptYqLSphcAMHRqutAUrUWhp9ggKGPDO6YzJjLfxZk=
In-reply-to: <20050120164529.6d6a5f0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050120164529.6d6a5f0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:45:29 -0800, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Now the code in ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c and ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c are
> almost identical for tcp_hash_connect.

Humm,  dccp_hash_connect is almost identical to tcp_hash_connect too...  /me
adds an entry to his TODO list... :-)

- Arnaldo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>