netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:53 +0100
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, iod00d@xxxxxx, eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx, roland@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, openib-general@xxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050119154132.68f0bb4f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1104764660.1048.578.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52brc68q05.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5cac192f05010308414a25b548@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527jmu8nbw.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5cac192f0501030907c755135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050103171227.GD7370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1104812294.1085.53.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050119144711.3fdd3d93.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050119151853.259de49a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050119154132.68f0bb4f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> Originally, dev->xmit_lock was added so that drivers that were SMP dumb
> could stay that way.  Thus preserving the guarentee that there would be
> only one active call into the dev->hard_start_xmit method across the
> entire system.  I don't think any of that is relevant any longer.  All
> of our network drivers are pretty clean in this regard.

(nit)

Almost all. I used the fact that dev->hard_start_xmit was issued in
a bh disabled context to exchange spinlock_irqsave for ordered ops
on ring indexes so as to sync hard_start_xmit and the irq handler in
the r8169 driver. It is a bit sick but Jon Mason reported it made a
noticeable difference to avoid the irqsave on its 4 way ppc64 and 
nobody complained about it.

--
Ueimor

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>