| To: | Nguyen Dinh Nam <64vn@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: iproute2 fwmark feature request |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:17:57 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41ECC61E.7060908@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41ECC61E.7060908@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Nguyen Dinh Nam <41ECC61E.7060908@xxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-18 15:17 > There are 2^32 values for fwmark, it's a hugh number. > netfilter deal with it better than iproute2, particularly, there is an > optional mask to apply to the fwmark before comparing it with some value > (mark module of iptables). It's very helpful because we can use that 32 > bits to store several sub values at the same time. > So it'll be cool if the syntax is > SELECTOR := [ from PREFIX ] [ to PREFIX ] [ tos TOS ] [ fwmark > FWMARK[/MASK] ] http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00548.html Wait 2-3 weeks and it will be all finished. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [2.6 patch] unexport xfrm_policy_delete, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-i n-IPv4 tunneling), Hollenbeck, Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | iproute2 fwmark feature request, Nguyen Dinh Nam |
| Next by Thread: | sis900: eth0: NULL pointer encountered in Rx ring, skipping, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |