| To: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling) |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:21:24 +0100 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200501162237.33743.hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050112222437.GC14280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1105905745.1097.858.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050116202041.GC22165@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501162237.33743.hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:37:33PM +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote: > > > BTW, have you looked at any of the L2VPN stuff? browse the ietf web > > > page. Some interesting stuff there. > > > > The L2TP RFC (RFC 2661, is that the same thing?) is 170kB, which scared > > me off somewhat. > > If L2TP, then v3 probably - RFC3931. That RFC appears not to exist. > But that's far from just ethernet over ip, it's anything over ip. Yeah, I really doubt that L2TP is what I'm after. --L |
| Previous by Date: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Hasso Tepper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Hasso Tepper |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Hasso Tepper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Hasso Tepper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |