| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: "Badness" again |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:39:38 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???????????? <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050115002638.GA13849@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41E83B8D.8020003@xxxxxxxxx> <20050114215833.GA12981@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41E844AC.6040200@xxxxxxxxx> <20050115002638.GA13849@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:26:38AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > Neither is true here and therefore we may have a situation where > the cached dst is released twice. In fact I tracked down the > address closest to the "badness" messages and it belongs to > one of your domain's name servers. That means the requests were > probably made by named, which is multi-threaded. The machine where I was seeing this (a HT P4) was indeed running named as well. This is the slave server for some zones, and the master server, which had a pretty much identical sw configuration (both Fedora 2, both using 6to4), is a (non-HT) Celeron and I never saw it happening there. --L |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] [IPV6] Don't use obsolete entries., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] remove superfluous diverter printk'ing, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: "Badness" again, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] merge sctp_opt with sctp_sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |