| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:04:26 -0800 |
| Cc: | anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050114215504.GA12569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050113171234.3fde0925.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114012504.GF6309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050113201914.46b7c4a2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114111648.GA27964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114120322.GA28449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114110352.23c94ab9.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114203452.GA1277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114132757.4ca3153a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114213829.GA12454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114133611.69ff0bb2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114215504.GA12569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:55:04 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As long as we're careful about what we've allocated in the skb then > everything will be alright. We're in trouble right now with mixed > sendmsg/sendpages calls and changing MSSs only because we're not > careful about keeping track of how much memory we've allocated > at the start. I see, but we don't want sendmsg() to charge a full MSS if the user is only writing 10 bytes of data onto the wire. That seems to be what happens if we implement things the way you are suggesting. |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] merge raw4_opt with raw_sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] merge raw4_opt with raw_sock, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |