| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:09:47 -0800 |
| Cc: | anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050114013737.GB11619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050113171234.3fde0925.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114013737.GB11619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:37:37 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 05:12:34PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > [ BTW, Herbert, it just occurred to me that these adjustments > > are incorrect for the skb->data pulling case since we really > > aren't liberating the data. ] > > Yes but I thought the idea was to fake it so the application > can transmit more packets? Without TSO, the data would've been > freed at this point. You're right. At most we'll pseudo-free no more than 1 full packet, so it's safe. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |