netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

[patch 08/19] net/ixgb_osdep: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()

To: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [patch 08/19] net/ixgb_osdep: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
From: domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:10:30 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx, nacc@xxxxxxxxxx, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


Any comments would be appreciated.

Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout()
to guarantee the task delays as expected. I was told earlier that the
in_interrupt() check is not necessary. It would be nice to get some
verification of this (i.e. the driver functions the same without it).

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---


 kj-domen/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_osdep.h |    8 +-------
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_osdep.h~msleep-drivers_net_ixgb_ixgb_osdep 
drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_osdep.h
--- kj/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_osdep.h~msleep-drivers_net_ixgb_ixgb_osdep 
2005-01-10 18:00:01.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_osdep.h      2005-01-10 18:00:01.000000000 
+0100
@@ -41,13 +41,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 
 #ifndef msec_delay
-#define msec_delay(x)  do { if(in_interrupt()) { \
-                               /* Don't mdelay in interrupt context! */ \
-                               BUG(); \
-                       } else { \
-                               set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
-                               schedule_timeout((x * HZ)/1000 + 2); \
-                       } } while(0)
+#define msec_delay(x)  msleep(x)
 #endif
 
 #define PCI_COMMAND_REGISTER   PCI_COMMAND
_

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [patch 08/19] net/ixgb_osdep: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), domen <=