| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix double dereference |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:30:39 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050106195333.2a90f6cb.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <41DA3A60.8050102@xxxxxxxxx> <20050107.111806.27181187.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050106195333.2a90f6cb.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050106195333.2a90f6cb.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:53:33 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:18:06 +0900 (JST) > YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am I miss something? > > Does every path which destroys an ipv6 socket do the > sk_dst_reset()? If so, your patch should be valid. Currently, inet6_destroy_sock() in net/ipv6/af_inet6.c, which is called from udpv6_destory_sock() etc., takes care of this. In that means, yes. However, one for ipv4 doesn't do this. I'll come up with new changesets. Thanks. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TG3 fix for slow switches (Was: TG3 driver failure on HP 16-way), Darren Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Check for SOL_SOCKET in compat_sys_getsockopt, David Woodhouse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix double dereference (Re: IPv6 badness continues), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix double dereference (Re: IPv6 badness continues), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |