On Thursday 06 January 2005 03:36 pm, Robert Olsson wrote:
> > I should have caught that sooner. 8( Well, I have a window of
> > opportunity here. If you want I can still provide a broken environment
> > but that seems pointless while NAPI is not acting right... what is
> > evident is that this will run better till we start to bump up against
> > the top of CPU0.
>
> I don't follow...
Technically by turning off NAPI, I have 'solved' my short term packet loss
problem.
However I can still provide you a window to go through further troubleshooting
if it is beneficial.
> The stats didn't show any numbers so we don't know your load.
Are you referring to the # of entries in the rt_cache table?
--
--------------------------------------------------
Jeremy M. Guthrie jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx
Senior Network Engineer Phone: 608-298-1061
Berbee Fax: 608-288-3007
5520 Research Park Drive NOC: 608-298-1102
Madison, WI 53711
pgpR5kC9SoyXO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|