| To: | Paul Jakma <paul@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 06 Jan 2005 08:55:58 -0500 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501051408330.27046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <OFB7F7E23F.EFB88418-ONC1256F7E.0031769E-C1256F7E.003270AD@xxxxxxxxxx> <1104764710.1048.580.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41DB26A6.2070008@xxxxxxxxx> <1104895169.1117.63.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501050627050.27046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1104931011.1118.134.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501051408330.27046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:29, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, jamal wrote: [..] > Sorry, wires crossed re "new behaviour". The "new new" behaviour in > the patch as you describe would be perfect. > > PS: Another issue, could we have kernel space IP fragmentation for > IP_HDRINCL sockets please? We currently have to implement > fragmentation ourselves, which seems silly given that kernel already > has this functionality. I will let some other fireman grab this bait ;-> If not i will revisit it after a unknown/random timeout. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Paul Jakma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Tommy Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |