| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:32:29 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050103125635.GB26856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Thomas Graf's message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:56:35 +0100") |
| References: | <20050103125635.GB26856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Thomas Graf: > I attached 4 patches of a first ematch implementation. Comments > and suggestions very much appreciated. Compiles but untested. This might infringe US patent 5,793,954 and the patents that reference it. 8-( |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] meta ematch, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] ematch API, u32 ematch, nbyte ematch, basic classifier, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |