| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver. |
| From: | Paul Jakma <paul@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:30:11 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1104895169.1117.63.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <OFB7F7E23F.EFB88418-ONC1256F7E.0031769E-C1256F7E.003270AD@xxxxxxxxxx> <1104764710.1048.580.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41DB26A6.2070008@xxxxxxxxx> <1104895169.1117.63.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 4 Jan 2005, jamal wrote: Theres possibly people who would want it differently - so for we havent heard from them. Maybe poll far and wide - or push it in and wait for them to whine. We're whining.This policy in the Linux kernel makes using Linux dangerous for certain routing applications (RIP, routing advertisements). Name a non-TCP application that *does* want this newish kernel policy and tell me how it breaks without this *new* policy. ;) cheers, jamal
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@xxxxxxxx paul@xxxxxxxxx Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
My only love sprung from my only hate!
Too early seen unknown, and known too late!
-- William Shakespeare, "Romeo and Juliet"
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Paul Jakma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: net patches, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |