|Subject:||Re: dummy as IMQ replacement|
|From:||Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:06:30 +0100|
|Cc:||Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|References:||<email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20050131132819.GB31837@postel.suug.ch> <email@example.com>|
> Yeah, that would fix it. Note however, that i am trying to highly > discourage use of iptables and i would rather let people who use > iptables to suffer;-> (sounds rude i know). At some point i plan to > remove the dependency on iptables altogether. Heh, I think it isn't rude, giving people a little clap to join the "good side" isn't that bad ;-> > So i am not sure whether i should encourage pushing of this patch or not ;-> I don't care that much, the patch is there, everyone can patch and distributions can pick it up. I agree that we should remove the dependency on iptables but I'd also like to see the dependency on the action bits to go away at the same time.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|