|Subject:||Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?|
|From:||rick jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:05:25 -0800|
|References:||<41F1516D.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <41F163AD.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <41F17B7E.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <41F186A8.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>|
On Jan 21, 2005, at 8:49 PM, David S. Miller wrote:
The code can potentially get really messy and ugly if we start preemptively building larger frames "hoping" the cwnd will be large enough by the time we push it onto the wire. Segmenting at send time is completely upside down to the way packets are built currently for transmission. A bad guess also means that we'll spend significant cycles chopping up TSO packets and resegmenting the queue.
so if i'm parsing correctly, with TSO enabled, at user send time, the send code builds "tso-sized" segments based on the value of cwnd at the time of the send.
with TSO disabled, at user send time, the code will build a string of MSS-sized segments and queue them.
then at transmit time, cwnd is consulted and either a group of mss-sized segments is sent, or a tso-sized segment is sent down the stack.
is it necessary to build TSO-sized segments at the time the user does the send? could just a chain of mss-sized segments be used as the TSO-sized segment?
admittedly, it is more buffers to manipulate by the NIC, and the large DMA's don't happen, but it means that TSO can take full advantage of cwnd at transmit time without much resegmentation.
rick jones there is no rest for the wicked, yet the virtuous have no pillows
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, rick jones|
|Next by Date:||[PATCH 1/5] sis900 printk audit, Daniele Venzano|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, David S. Miller|
|Next by Thread:||Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, Rick Jones|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|