netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:47:11 -0800
Cc: iod00d@xxxxxx, eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx, roland@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, openib-general@xxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1104812294.1085.53.camel@jzny.localdomain>
References: <5cac192f0412230110628749e3@mail.gmail.com> <41CAF444.3000305@trash.net> <5cac192f04122408102129af43@mail.gmail.com> <1104240717.1100.66.camel@jzny.localdomain> <5cac192f0501021530672a908a@mail.gmail.com> <1104764660.1048.578.camel@jzny.localdomain> <52brc68q05.fsf@topspin.com> <5cac192f05010308414a25b548@mail.gmail.com> <527jmu8nbw.fsf@topspin.com> <5cac192f0501030907c755135@mail.gmail.com> <20050103171227.GD7370@esmail.cup.hp.com> <1104812294.1085.53.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 03 Jan 2005 23:18:14 -0500
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 12:12, Grant Grundler wrote:
> 
> > Some workloads that Jamal cares about (routing) only need 2 cpus.
> 
> What bothers me is more the complexity this has introduced more than
> the workload. OTOH, 1-2% improvement posted by Roland is good
> justification.

I think I'm going to put in something like Eric's patch and fix
up the other LLTX drivers as per his sungem patch.

There is a part of me that does want to yank LLTX for non-loopback
out of the tree.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>