Sridhar Samudrala escreveu:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
David S. Miller escreveu:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:52:13 -0200
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please take a look and if its acceptable pull from:
The tricky bit here is that SCTP, to keep the existing logic,
needs a way to copy only its private area from one sock to another, so
I introduced a generic inet_sk_copy_descendant, that knows about the
inet (v4/v6) layout (wrt inet_sock and inet6_pinfo), using this and
sk->sk_prot->slab_obj_size we can copy the inet_sock descendant
private area generically.
This looks fine, although I wish the descendant copying thing
could be done more cleanly somehow.
/me too, but this is the best scheme I've found for now, perhaps in
the future, after some more refactoring work is done/merged we can
find some better way of doing this (tcp_create_openreq_child also
does something like this, but does it in all the sock, perhaps
SCTP can do something similar).
I thought you introduced this generic function so that other protocols also
may use it. If you & Dave feel that this is not clean and is going to be
needed only by SCTP, SCTP also could do a memcpy of the entire sock instead
of only sctp private area before calling sctp_sock_migrate although it is not
very straightforward. Let me know if i should work on a patch to do that.
Sridhar, please leave it as is for now, perhaps some other protocol will
I still have decnet, econet, x.25, wanrouter, etc to go, and this is not
we should spend too much time for now, I think, I'm more than happy if you
just tell me that this is equivalent to what we had before, i.e. that I didn't
introduced any bugs 8)