netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Badness" again

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "Badness" again
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:39:38 +0100
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???????????? <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050115002638.GA13849@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <41E83B8D.8020003@pobox.com> <20050114215833.GA12981@gondor.apana.org.au> <41E844AC.6040200@pobox.com> <20050115002638.GA13849@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:26:38AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:

> Neither is true here and therefore we may have a situation where
> the cached dst is released twice.  In fact I tracked down the
> address closest to the "badness" messages and it belongs to
> one of your domain's name servers.  That means the requests were
> probably made by named, which is multi-threaded.

The machine where I was seeing this (a HT P4) was indeed running
named as well.  This is the slave server for some zones, and the
master server, which had a pretty much identical sw configuration
(both Fedora 2, both using 6to4), is a (non-HT) Celeron and I never
saw it happening there.


--L

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>