netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue

To: Grant Grundler <iod00d@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Jan 2005 23:18:14 -0500
Cc: Eric Lemoine <eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx>, Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, openib-general@xxxxxxxxxx, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050103171227.GD7370@esmail.cup.hp.com>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <5cac192f0412230110628749e3@mail.gmail.com> <41CAF444.3000305@trash.net> <5cac192f04122408102129af43@mail.gmail.com> <1104240717.1100.66.camel@jzny.localdomain> <5cac192f0501021530672a908a@mail.gmail.com> <1104764660.1048.578.camel@jzny.localdomain> <52brc68q05.fsf@topspin.com> <5cac192f05010308414a25b548@mail.gmail.com> <527jmu8nbw.fsf@topspin.com> <5cac192f0501030907c755135@mail.gmail.com> <20050103171227.GD7370@esmail.cup.hp.com>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 12:12, Grant Grundler wrote:

> Some workloads that Jamal cares about (routing) only need 2 cpus.

What bothers me is more the complexity this has introduced more than
the workload. OTOH, 1-2% improvement posted by Roland is good
justification.

cheers,
jamal



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>