| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | A sending packet and its socket and sock |
| From: | Park Lee <parklee_sel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:22:21 -0800 (PST) |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=rN0CgE3gI0+JrTIE7SHX+O9KBCWBUTbzjsGQJOtfSH1VKCefzcc6AziWfjaPoFE33N/CPfo5ZMthneEcnkxMvIVXAOn5nXHhrnjYPgOH6TiRaM8WxICNNtszTIPUCCQZtcS0vRtGKdLmhnKeZ6uiQJnDbe64bl9GiybjHeJI1Vo= ; |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi,
In Linux IP network, when a packet is going to be
sent out. Would you please tell me which one of the
following items is right for the packet (Let's suppose
struct sock *sk; struct socket *skt):
1), The packet has a sock (i.e. sk!=NULL), but
doesn't has a socket (i.e. skt=NULL) corresponding to
the packet?
2), The packet has a socket (i.e. skt!=NULL), but
doesn't has a sock (i.e. sk=NULL) corresponding to the
packet?
3), The packet doesn't has the both (i.e. sk=NULL
and skt=NULL)?
And, If some of them are right, Would you please
also give me some examples of them?
Thank you very much.
=====
Best Regards,
Park Lee
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/9] PKT_SCHED: tc filter extension API, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Issue on packets sending through ip_route_output_key() to xfrm_lookup() in native IPsec, Park Lee |
| Next by Thread: | [patch] e100 MDI/MDIX bug(?), Eran Mann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |