On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 04:48, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 03:48:34 -0500, David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote in message <20041230035000.10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > diff -Nru a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> > --- a/include/net/xfrm.h 2004-12-30 01:12:08 -05:00
> > +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h 2004-12-30 01:12:08 -05:00
> > @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@
> > /* Private data of this transformer, format is opaque,
> > * interpreted by xfrm_type methods. */
> > void *data;
> > +
> > + /* Intended direction of this state, used for offloading */
> > + int dir;
> > };
> >
> > enum {
> > @@ -157,6 +160,12 @@
> > XFRM_STATE_DEAD
> > };
> >
> > +enum {
> > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_UNKNOWN,
> > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_IN,
> > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_OUT,
> > +};
>
> Any specific reason to first define such a nice enum and then using int
> in the struct?
Just following the current style in net/xfrm.h, see xfrm_state.km.state
and XFRM_STATE_*.
Though, I probably should have used a u8; easily changed if it is an
issue.
--
Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|