| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: validate policer configuration TLVs |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:34:24 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041208203942.GO1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041207172349.GG1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041207213234.257fd0d9.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041208203942.GO1371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:39:42 +0100 Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Either these things are int's or u32's, they cannot be both :-) > > I know that size wise it's identical, but at least make the code > > look consistent. > > OK, I changed the dereferencing to use u32 as well and have it "casted" > while assigning the value since changing the structure datatypes > wouldn't make sense. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> Applied, thanks Thomas. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH][INET] move inet_sock into inet_opt and rename it to inet_sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [ATM]: small atm cleanups (from Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: validate policer configuration TLVs, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | What is a reasonable upper limit to the rt_hash_table., Robin Holt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |