netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:51:28 +0000
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041227142350.1cf444fe.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1104156983.20944.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41D043AC.2070203@xxxxxxxxx> <20041227142350.1cf444fe.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Llu, 2004-12-27 at 22:23, David S. Miller wrote:
> If we are really going to do something like this, it should
> be calculated properly and be determined per-interface
> type as netdevs are registered.

Fine by me, I'm just going through plausible looking changes in the Red
Hat tree. You might want to slightly injure someone internally until
they drop that too 8)

Alan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>