Getting back to an ooooold thread...
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:06:30PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <20040921195752.015e3d1d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 21 Sep 2004
> 19:57:52 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:20:12 +0900 (JST)
> > YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@(B <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This behavior lives for years (AFAIK),
> > > and we haven't got so many reports
> > > because people usually bring loopback device first.
> > >
> > > I think the following message will help people, anyway.
> > If ipv6 has a dependency upon this, why doesn't it just
> > bring the device up itself at this moment if necessary?
> Okay, I'll make a patch for this.
As far as I can see (please correct me) no such patch was included so
far, at least with 2.6.10-rc3 I still have the old behaviour.
Could you please include the proposed printk-warning-patch until the
issue gets resolved?
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.gnumonks.org/
Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime
Description: Digital signature