| To: | "Michael Chan" <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TG3 fix for slow switches (Was: TG3 driver failure on HP 16-way) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:31:38 -0800 |
| Cc: | peterc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <B1508D50A0692F42B217C22C02D84972020F3CED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <B1508D50A0692F42B217C22C02D84972020F3CED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:02:44 -0800 "Michael Chan" <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David, While the 2nd patch or something similar should be applied, I > think the underlying cause of tg3_readphy() returning error should be > further investigated. Would this condition be possible if something, such as ASF, were continually polling the PHY in parallel with the driver? On the other hand, it doesn't seem so foreign for the PHY to block out register accesses for long periods of time for various reasons. But yes I'd also like to know more about exactly what is going on in this case. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, Roland Dreier |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: TG3 fix for slow switches (Was: TG3 driver failure on HP 16-way), Michael Chan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: TG3 fix for slow switches (Was: TG3 driver failure on HP 16-way), Michael Chan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |