| To: | Paul Jakma <paul@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 20 Dec 2004 09:11:39 -0500 |
| Cc: | Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412192349210.31558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <OF28701C56.81E1D26E-ONC1256F6B.00513EDD-C1256F6B.0052AF84@xxxxxxxxxx> <1103484552.1046.155.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412192349210.31558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 18:54, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, jamal wrote: > > > This is the strange part. Anyone still willing to provide a sample > > program that hangs? > > I can provide instructions, or you can wait a wee bit - I didnt have > any e1000 hardware to test with (e1000 being one of the drivers which > has this behavious, AFAIK/TTBOMK) - but a computer with an e1000 > arrived Friday. So, give me a bit and I'll try come up with a test > case. A simple UDP send should be enough. When you are ready let me know, we could repeat what i said in my last email. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark must take care of shared/cloned skbs, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Paul Jakma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |