| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark must take care of shared/cloned skbs |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:36:41 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1103487827.1048.188.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041218170017.GH17998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1103487827.1048.188.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1103487827.1048.188.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-12-19 15:23 > If the qdisc at that level muddies the packet thats fair game - thats > what goes out on the wire. So we should leave the code as is. Agreed for egress but I think it is needed for stuff like IMQ. It's debatable whether we should take care of IMQ and alike though. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix cls indev validation, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: primary and secondary ip addresses, Harald Welte |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark must take care of shared/cloned skbs, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark must take care of shared/cloned skbs, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |