| To: | Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.. |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:14:20 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Crazy AMD K7 <snort2004@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1103368330.3566.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1131604877.20041218092730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73zn0ccaee.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1103368330.3566.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> The bridge-nf code does not use recursive function calls and there is no > long consecutive function calling. Furthermore, there is no function in > the bridge-nf code that uses a large part of the stack. Just take a look at the backtrace in the original post. It clearly shows a problem. And it points strongly towards br-netfilter. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., Bart De Schuymer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., Bart De Schuymer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., Bart De Schuymer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., Bart De Schuymer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |