| To: | jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCH] e1000 poll behavior |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:02:06 +0100 |
| Cc: | gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, robert.olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1103104917.41c00b9533464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1103104917.41c00b9533464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Is there any advantage in exiting NAPI polled state as soon as
> possible with the work_done < work_to_do test? Why not stay in
> polled mode until no rx or tx work is done, i.e. only exit polled
> state if work_done is zero?
Yes it's a variant.
> When working on e100 a while ago, I found better and more consistent
> pps numbers by staying in polled mode until the interface went idle.
> See current e100 code. Unfortunately I don't have e1000 hardware to
> test if the same is true for e1000.
I'll try this with the forwarding setup when I got a chance but I'll
think server-like setups are more interesting to test.
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: primary and secondary ip addresses, Hasso Tepper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] pktgen sleeping/timing rework, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: [PATCH] e1000 poll behavior, jchapman |
| Next by Thread: | Limit the route hash size., Robin Holt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |