netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] fix select() for SOCK_RAW sockets (ipv6)

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix select() for SOCK_RAW sockets (ipv6)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:58:50 +0900 (JST)
Cc: shemminger@xxxxxxxx, mitch@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20041208.023530.26430801.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041207100140.781f4c00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 7 Dec 2004 
10:48:15 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:01:40 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Probably, we need to do the same for ipv6, don't we?
> > 
> > diff -Nru a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> > --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c   2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c   2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00
> > @@ -513,6 +513,27 @@
> 
> We didn't do the "UDP select() fix" on ipv6 because we don't
> have the delayed checksumming optimization there.  So the
> ipv6 side really doesn't need this change.

Ok, thanks for the explanation.

--yoshfuji @ Strasbourg


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>