| To: | Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Dec 2004 23:31:58 -0500 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041207211035.GA20286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20041206205305.GA11970@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041207211035.GA20286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 16:10, Karsten Desler wrote: > Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Current packetload on eth0 (and reversed on eth1): > > 115kpps tx > > 135kpps rx > > I totally forgot to mention: There are approximately 100k concurrent > flows. ;-> Aha. That would make a huge difference. I know of noone who has actually done this level of testing. I have tried upto about 50K flows myself in early 2.6.x and was eventually compute bound. Really try compiling out totaly iptables/netfilter - it will make a difference. You may also want to try something like LC trie algorithm that Robert and co are playing with to see if it makes a difference with this many flows. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9, Jamal Hadi Salim |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, Karsten Desler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, Karsten Desler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |