Re: [PATCH] rtnetlink & address family problem

[Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>]

> > I don't think it is wrong myself but I understand if someone does. If
> > one sends a GETADDR request for PF_INET6 one might expect to either
> > receive all ipv6 addresses or none and to only receive all addresess
> > of any type if PF_UNSPEC was specified.
> > 
> 
> Thats debatable.
> Its user space that issues the flushing after a response from the
> kernel. It happens to be flushing IPV4 addresses.
> Thats why your filter in ip is the answer. 

Agreed.

> BTW, did the gnet_stats patches to iproute2 ever get merged?

Not sure, I will check that.

> If you have cycles, can you please look at that hang being reported
> using older tc with 2.6.10-rc3?

It's not really related to the gnet_stats code.  stats_lock isn't set
in the action code when using an older iproute2. I haven't tested this
case because it was marked as broken anyway. I compiled an older version
of iproute2 and will look into it today.