| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:52:52 -0800 |
| Cc: | michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041202134930.132d7bd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041027092531.78fe438c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200411020854.44745.michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041104100104.570e67cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200411051103.59032.michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041117153025.160eaa04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041130214643.7b72300e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041201152446.3a0d5ce3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041201204622.7b760400.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041202134930.132d7bd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:49:30 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > These are run on a relatively slow machine (2 way Pentium III 850Mhz) > and it looks like the results are no change (in the noise). Or averaged out, about 1ms more expensive. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised), Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised), Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised), Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised), Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |