netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using

To: Ross Kendall Axe <ross.axe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:19:43 -0800
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <419D6746.2020603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ross.axe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 03:23:50AM +0000
References: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0411180257300.3144-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0411180305060.3192-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041118084449.Z14339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <419D6746.2020603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
* Ross Kendall Axe (ross.axe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Taking this idea further, couldn't we split unix_dgram_sendmsg into 2 
> functions, do_unix_dgram_sendmsg and do_unix_connectionless_sendmsg (and 
> similarly for unix_stream_sendmsg), then all we'd need is:
> 
> <pseudocode>
> static int do_unix_dgram_sendmsg(...);
> static int do_unix_stream_sendmsg(...);
> static int do_unix_connectionless_sendmsg(...);
> static int do_unix_connectional_sendmsg(...);

We could probably break it down to better functions and helpers, but I'm
not sure that's quite the breakdown.  That looks to me like an indirect
way to pass a flag which is already encoded in the ops and sk_type.
At anyrate, for 2.6.10 the changes should be small and obvious.
Better refactoring should be left for 2.6.11.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>