| To: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET |
| From: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:01:09 -0800 |
| Cc: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ross Kendall Axe <ross.axe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Xine.LNX.4.44.0411182207080.7831-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:12:13PM -0500 |
| References: | <1100821144.6005.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0411182207080.7831-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
* James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Alan Cox wrote: > > > As to the other stuff I think the only change needed is to check the > > queued asynchronous error and report that before going on to the > > connected test > > How about this? The other patch is already committed, so relative diff would be needed. > (Also now ignores any supplied address per > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sendto.html) Nitpick, but I missed where it said ignore the address. And it seems counter intuitive to provide address, only to have it ignored and delivered elsewhere. thanks, -chris |
| Previous by Date: | MOD_[INC|DEC]_USE_COUNT & Kernel 2.6, Hendrik Wiese |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |