| To: | Ross Kendall Axe <ross.axe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:59:43 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <419C4E72.5050307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Ross Kendall Axe wrote: > That seems eminently sensible. Again, I was just cut-n'-pasting from > SOCK_STREAM. If these error codes are wrong, then SOCK_STREAM also needs > fixing. An issue here though is that what impact will this have on existing applications? > > > > There is a non SELinux-related bug lurking in this code. > > IMHO, there never was an SELinux bug here. SELinux merely exposed an > existing bug. Looks like it, testing a fix now. > I'm unable to reproduce that, or the bug you mention in your other > message. Care to send us your code? See http://people.redhat.com/jmorris/net/seqpacket-killer-jm.tar.bz2 > I think that af_unix.c needs a bit of cleaning up. All of the functions > are named as being stream vs dgram, even when the issue is connectionless > vs connection-oriented. Agreed. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, Ross Kendall Axe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, Ross Kendall Axe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |