| To: | John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A case AGAINST checksum offload |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:32:23 +0100 |
| Cc: | Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411121854220.8989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411121644150.8989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1100303625.14465.631.camel@localhost> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411121854220.8989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> : [...] > The point is that I think it's a good idea to mitigate the effects of > faulty hardware, especially if you can do so nearly for free. Perhaps it could go as a new option for ethtool -t. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (15/23) sk98: rearrange initialization, shemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch] net/core/pktgen.c shouldn't include pci.h, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A case AGAINST checksum offload, John Heffner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A case AGAINST checksum offload, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |