[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug in ipv6_ifa_notify?

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bug in ipv6_ifa_notify?
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 23:10:40 +1100
In-reply-to: <20041108073441.GA2200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20041108061529.GA1774@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041108073441.GA2200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:34:41PM +1100, herbert wrote:
> RTM_DELADDR will call ip6_del_rt which will free the rt using
> dst_free.  Since it is still referenced it gets put on the gc
> list.  The next RTM_NEWADDR will put it back in the table.
> From this point onwards anything that gets linked after it will
> be on the gc list!

Actually, address objects dont't seem to be kept across interface
down/up operations, so this probably can't happen...
Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>