netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BUG: dst underflow (again)

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BUG: dst underflow (again)
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:02:11 +0100
Cc: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041105162319.6e2917c5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4178AB0D.6060107@xxxxxxxxx> <20041022.155159.98771450.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022075947.GA15795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1099577717.1039.155.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041104221801.584c8f11.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041105091427.GB28112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <418B4B1A.8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041105101513.GA28779@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041105162319.6e2917c5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:23:19PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:

> > > >IPSEC.. not that I know of.  So unless my distro does stuff behind
> > > >my back, no.  How do I make sure?
> > > 
> > > setkey -DP
> > 
> > Thanks.  Both machines I'm seeing this problem on have:
> > 
> > # setkey -DP
> > No SPD entries.
> > # 
> 
> Well, xfrm_lookup() is returning an error somehow, that's the only
> way to execute dst_release() in udpv6_sendmsg().  And xfrm_lookup()
> only returns errors if IPSEC policies have been configured either
> globally or locally for the socket.

Please note that my traces were made on the Fedora Core 2 kernel
('2.6.8-1.521smp'), where these codepaths all look a bit different.

I'm hoping to try a mainline kernel on one of these boxes soon.


cheers,
Lennert

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>