netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len

To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:06:44 +1100
Cc: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041101215944.GB17279@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20041030030936.GA25102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1099163419.1039.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101044433.GA18772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101173434.GA12437@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101202754.GA23149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101203821.GA15086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101204131.GA23277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101204533.GA17279@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1099345849.1073.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041101215944.GB17279@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:59:44PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> 
> Actually, -EOVERFLOW appears throughout the kernel.  A couple examples:

I agree.  Please disregard my comment re ERANGE.
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>