On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Ross Kendall Axe wrote:
> That seems eminently sensible. Again, I was just cut-n'-pasting from
> SOCK_STREAM. If these error codes are wrong, then SOCK_STREAM also needs
An issue here though is that what impact will this have on existing
> > There is a non SELinux-related bug lurking in this code.
> IMHO, there never was an SELinux bug here. SELinux merely exposed an
> existing bug.
Looks like it, testing a fix now.
> I'm unable to reproduce that, or the bug you mention in your other
> message. Care to send us your code?
> I think that af_unix.c needs a bit of cleaning up. All of the functions
> are named as being stream vs dgram, even when the issue is connectionless
> vs connection-oriented.