| To: | "Pekka J Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net: generic netdev_ioaddr |
| From: | Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:18:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <courier.418290EC.00002E85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Pekka J. Enberg's message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:50:20 +0300") |
| References: | <1099044244.9566.0.camel@localhost> <20041029131607.GU24336@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <courier.418290EC.00002E85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"Pekka J Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yup, I thought about that after I sent the patch. However, as it > stands now, many network drivers use netdev->base_addr for just that. > Perhaps it should be nuked completely instead? I thinks so. With ifmap, SIOCSIFMAP, ifr_map, mem_end etc., irq, if_port, dma. -- Krzysztof Halasa |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: net: generic netdev_ioaddr, Pekka J Enberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: net: generic netdev_ioaddr, Al Viro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net: generic netdev_ioaddr, Pekka J Enberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net: generic netdev_ioaddr, Al Viro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |