netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/12] S2io: cosmetic changes

To: "'Jeff Garzik'" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/12] S2io: cosmetic changes
From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:10:59 -0700
Cc: "'Francois Romieu'" <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx>, <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>, <rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx>, <alicia.pena@xxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <418181D9.5010603@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff,
Looks like outlook client is garbling some of the patch.
We'll try to send using different client, but can you pls
try with -l option on all the patches and see if it applies
cleanly ?

Thanks for your patience.

Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 4:34 PM
To: ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Francois Romieu'; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx; leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx;
raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx; rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx;
alicia.pena@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/12] S2io: cosmetic changes


With this new resend, I tried with both my automated scripts, and 
applying manually as well.

All attempts succeed on patches #1 and #2, but fail on #3 - #12.

If I manually add the "-l" argument to patch(1), then patch #3 succeeds. 
  That implies that somewhere in your process, whitespace in your 
patches is getting corrupted.

        Jeff




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>