[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN

To: Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:35:12 -0700
Cc: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4181838B.6040002@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <41797696.9070905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022214611.GA4948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41798506.1030909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <417D675F.3000909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4181838B.6040002@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:40:59 +0200
Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dave, I think this part of the patch should be reverted until someone comes 
> up with a
> general scheme for flow_control handling through virtual devices.

It's certainly more correct, I think, than the code which
was there previously.

But in a way you're right, this is inconsistent with how IP and all
sorts of other tunnels behave, and if we change things we should
do it across the board.

So I will revert this part of his changes for now.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>