| To: | Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:25:45 -0700 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041025195815.GA28640@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1CK3Az-0004P2-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020164748.GA20905@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020212651.GA8534@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041020225536.GA22179@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021130339.GA19345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021165224.GA25399@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041021215743.GA23062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022185435.GA30709@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022215040.GA13309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041022232403.GA14618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041025195815.GA28640@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:58:15 -0700 Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Later on we can "fix" this by remembering where the original TSO > > packet started from, perhaps in skb->h or somewhere. Dave, is this > > worth it? > > Looks like your most recent 2 patches did the trick. Uptime on the > test box is over 4 hours, whereas before I could count on a panic > within about an hour. I'll continue running 2.6.9 + your patches > and let you know if this changes... Thanks for testing Phil. Herbert I'll ponder over this patch today. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1] remove NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c, Phil Oester |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.9 failed assertion in tcp_timer.c, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |