Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg()

netdev

Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg()

To:	Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg()
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:29:03 -0700
Cc:	yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0410222004070.18616-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20041022.153137.99739029.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410222004070.18616-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:07:01 -0400 (EDT)
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Dave/Yoshifuji,
>   I agree that the case you pointed out is tricky. I am fine with either 
> EAFNOSUPPORT or EINVAL. But the POSIX and SUSv3 man pages specify EINVAL 
> as a error only when the sum of iov_len values overflows ssize_t.

I now think EAFNOSUPPORT is fine.

Please resend your patch to me under private cover so I
can apply it Suresh, thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), Suresh Krishnan Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), David S. Miller Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), Suresh Krishnan Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: TCP crashes when cycling loopback interface., James Morris
Next by Date:	Re: TCP crashes when cycling loopback interface., Herbert Xu
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), Suresh Krishnan
Next by Thread:	BUG: dst underflow (again), Jeff Garzik
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]