| To: | "'Francois Romieu'" <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: s2io: patch disposition |
| From: | "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:38:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | "'Jeff Garzik'" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx>, <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>, <rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20041018222107.GA19990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Francois, When we resend the patches, they will be inlined in the e-mail. Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:21 PM To: Ravinandan Arakali Cc: Jeff Garzik; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx; leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx; raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx; rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: s2io: patch disposition Ravinandan Arakali <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> : [...] > We'll resend the original 8 patches, followed by patch to address > your comments. Is it okay to send a single patch to address your > comments or you want that to be split as well ? Dumb question: is there something which prevents your patches to be sent with an MUA which inlines patches ? Or is there any hope for you to run some Perl crap on your computer ? :o) -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: s2io: patch disposition, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.6.9 4/5] skge: use netdev_priv, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: s2io: patch disposition, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | PATCH: netpoll with xircom_cb, Petr Konecny |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |