On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:07:42PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:57:57PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> >
> > Ok, would you like to receive a patch that fixes the xfrm netlink
> > interface to be more compatible with the netlink manpage and what
> > rtnetlink does?
>
> I have no objections at all :)
>
> While you're at it please fix the other netlink users as well, e.g.,
> tcp_diag.
I did a short grep for netlink_dump and the only two places where
F_MULTI wasn't used was tcp_diag.c and xfrm_user.c. Please let me know
if you know any other cases.
Pleae find a proposed patch attached to this email. I didn't have the
means to test it at this point, though.. but it's pretty
straightforward. Please consider applying it...
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime
2.6.9-rc3-bk9-netlink_f_multi.patch
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|