| To: | Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 17/38] net/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() |
| From: | margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx (Margit Schubert-While) |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:07:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, hvr@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041001165523.GC11646@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5.1.0.14.2.20041001084419.02570b18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5.1.0.14.2.20040924074745.00b1cd40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040923221303.GB13244@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040923221303.GB13244@xxxxxxxxxx> <5.1.0.14.2.20040924074745.00b1cd40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5.1.0.14.2.20041001084419.02570b18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 09:55 01.10.2004 -0700, Greg scribeth: On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:04:27AM +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote: > At 00:15 01.10.2004 -0400, Jeff scribeth: > >I would rather see an msleep implementation in 2.4.x... > > Hear, hear. > And can we PLEASE have a > "#define HAVE_MSLEEP" in delay.h ?!!! > (2.4. AND 2.6) No, this is not how the kernel source tree works, sorry. Well it happened with netdev_priv ;-) (HAVE_NETDEV_PRIV) Margit |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oops at __neigh_for_each_release (2.6.9-rc3), Duncan Sands |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.6] [IPV6] SIT: dst leakage in error path., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 17/38] net/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), Greg KH |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 17/38] net/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |