| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Please route new work through -mm tree? |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:13:55 -0700 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1096481023.8636.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1096481023.8636.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031008 |
Stephen Hemminger wrote: There is lots of stuff going on that has a potential to make things less stable. How about routing any future TCP, fib, statistics, stuff through Andrew's tree and not directly to Linus. That way we have some buffer and can stablize some more. Alternatively, Dave you could publize your staging area some more. That would help us out a bit - we're testing mainline and -mm regularly. This came up for me yesterday, too, with Dave's tso patches (which I'm testing right now, after getting past some hw issues). I was going to suggest a separate bk tree or something that would hold this stuff till it stabilized, before it needed to go into mainline. Having that picked up by mm would help us to increase coverage quite a bit. thanks, Nivedita |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Please route new work through -mm tree?, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?, Marcos D. Marado Torres |
| Previous by Thread: | Please route new work through -mm tree?, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?, Marcos D. Marado Torres |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |